With one minute left in a close basketball game, Tara and Emek compared two possible plays. For Strategy A, team statistics showed a 0.80 probability of completing a pass, followed by a 0.65 probability of making the shot. Their tree diagram gave a success probability of 0.80 times 0.65 = 0.52. Strategy B offered two ways to score: a direct shot with probability 0.38, or, if that shot missed with probability 0.62, a rebound followed by a second shot. The probability of securing the rebound was 0.50, and the probability of making the second shot was 0.55. Emek calculated the second scoring path as 0.62 times 0.50 times 0.55 = 0.1705. Adding the two successful paths gave Strategy B a probability of 0.5505. Since 0.5505 was greater than 0.52, Tara and Emek recommended Strategy B. The team followed the plan and created the scoring opportunity it needed.




